Written By David Gomez, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter
MIDDLESEX COUNTY – During the September 10 council meeting, Middlesex County council held an important discussion about the future of the county’s strategic planning. Council reviewed a report from CAO Bill Rayburn, outlining the status of the current strategic plan, and deliberated on the next steps for developing the new plan.
Rayburn emphasized the importance of setting the groundwork for the next strategic phase, explaining that although the current plan is nearing its conclusion, completing the new plan by the end of the year may be challenging given the limited time available. He suggested that much of the preparatory work could be completed this year, with the bulk of the planning to take place in early 2025.
The main topic of debate was how to proceed with developing the new strategic plan. Rayburn presented three options to council: development by internal staff (Option A), a hybrid approach using both internal staff and external consultants (Option B), or relying solely on external consultants (Option C). Each option had its merits, with the internal approach offering continuity and local expertise, and external consultants providing fresh perspectives and specialized skills.
Councillors weighed in on the decision. Councillor Colin Grantham expressed his preference for Option B, which involved a hybrid approach, citing the importance of fresh perspectives combined with internal expertise. He asked for clarification on the role of council in the process, to which Rayburn confirmed that council would play a central role in shaping the strategic priorities, regardless of the approach.
Councillor Sue Clarke, on the other hand, raised concerns about the timeline and capacity of internal staff, leaning toward Option A, which relied solely on internal development. Clarke questioned whether the county had sufficient internal resources to manage the process, to which Rayburn acknowledged that while capacity was tight, it could still be feasible with the current team.
Councillor Michelle Smibert advocated for Option C, suggesting that the use of external consultants would provide a more objective approach and reduce the workload on staff. However, several councillors highlighted the value of combining both internal knowledge and external input, with councillor Allan Mayhew noting that external consultants could engage councillors in valuable one-on-one conversations, providing fresh insights.
Ultimately, after a thorough discussion, Councillor Grantham moved a motion to adopt Option B, which was seconded by Councillor John Brennan. The motion was passed with six councillors in favour and two opposed.